🔗 Share this article

In a notable legal reversal, a national review panel has reversed a earlier ruling that blocked viewers in Australia from accessing recorded content of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was initiated by Elon Musk's company X, which contested an directive sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Case and Classification Ruling

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September, the eSafety commissioner applied to the review board to officially classify the circulating video. The board initially ruled the content was "refused classification", a rating that empowered the regulator to order social media companies to geo-block the posts for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos related to the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a comparable ban on a separate video—depicting the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been classified as "refused classification".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

Arguing its case, X contended that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the bystanders.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or objectionable, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of public importance that generated widespread discussion". The platform even compared the video and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the review board concluded that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with different editing could have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the panel revised the rating of the content to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

Some on the panel held a contrary view, contending the post was "content designed for sharing for the likely purposes of entertainment and/or benefit (such as likes, shares, or views)". They also argued the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was released long after the event, "once emotions regarding it had calmed".

Response Following the Outcome

In a statement on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this decision to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of public access about matters of public significance. We remain dedicated to safeguarding these fundamental values."

A spokesperson for the safety regulator also welcomed the ruling, but pointed out that the revised classification now implies platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to users under 18".

Recent Developments on Sensitive Footage

In related news, the eSafety commissioner has not issued take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding graphic footage from the Sydney beach incident circulating on social media. Officials commented that while the content were upsetting, they did not reach the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, platforms have been advised to use sensitive content labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on such content in line with their existing community guidelines.